Table 3.
Potential interventions for sarcopenia and frailty
Intervention | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Exercise | Resistance or aerobic exercise training with demonstrated benefits including improvement in physical fitness, muscle strength, and cardiovascular parameters | Low uptake and long-term participation in patients Lack of time or clinical expertise Scarce availability of equipment or appropriate training programs |
Nutritional supplementation | The association between nutrition and muscle health underpins the importance of maintaining an optimal nutritional status in the prevention of sarcopenia/frailty Correct nutritional deficits and address weight loss of frailty syndrome High-quality, protein-enriched, oral nutritional supplements have been shown to be beneficial |
Up to 40% of older adults do not meet the recommended target Inconsistent adherence |
Pharmacological treatment
|
Existing pharmacological agents with favorable safety profiles including vitamin D, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and oral alkali supplements | Small number of participants in clinical studies and questionable utility in the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia and frailty Undesirable adverse events (e.g., testosterone is associated with cardiovascular adverse effects) |
Psychosocial support / health education / multidisciplinary intervention | Modifiable risk factors including alcohol and smoking cessation, increase physical activity and psychosocial support | Patient choice (poor adherence) Scarce resources or lack of access to psychosocial support |