Table 2.
Post-intervention ratings of different aspects of ReMind (n = 22)
| Difficulty of | (Too) easy | Just right | (Too) difficult |
| Information in strategy training | 7 | 13 | 2 |
| Fill-in exercises in strategy training | 9 | 7 | 4 |
| Retraining (C-Car game) | 13 | 8 | – |
| Amount/number of | (Too) little/few | About right | (Too) much/many |
| Information in strategy training | 1 | 19 | 2 |
| Fill-in exercises in strategy training | – | 7 | 14 |
| Retraining exercises (C-Car game) | 11 | 10 | 1 |
| Supervision by the researcher/trainer | – | 22 | – |
| Usefulness of | (Very) useful | Neutral | Not useful |
| Information in strategy traininga | 14 | 5 | 2 |
| Fill-in exercises in strategy traininga | 5 | 10 | 5 |
| Retraining exercises (C-Car game) | 19 | 2 | 1 |
| (Telephone) contact with the researcher/trainer | 16 | 6 | – |
| Content addressed daily problems | Fully/largely | Partly | Not |
| 10 | 7 | 4 | |
| Application of learnt (strategies) in daily life | Often/regularly | Sometimes | Seldom/never |
| 9 | 7 | 6 | |
| Impact of cognitive problems has changed | Yes, positively | Nob | Yes, negatively |
| 10 | 11 | – | |
| Coping with cognitive problems has changed | Improved coping | Noc | Worsened coping |
| 6 | 16 | – | |
| Pleasantness of working on ReMind | (Very) pleasant | Neutral | (Very) unpleasant |
| 7 | 14 | – | |
| Excellent/good | Sufficient | Insufficient/poor | |
| Using an iPad-app for cognitive rehabilitation | 20 | 2 | – |
| Capability of the researcher/trainer | 20 | 2 | – |
| Contact with the researcher/trainer | 21 | 1 | – |
| Overall rating of the program | 19 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | No | ||
| Recommendation to other brain tumor patients | 21 | 1 |
aMissing values for two participants
bNo change, there was no impact on daily life (7) or no change, impact remained the same (4)
cCoping is still good (14), or coping is still not good (2)