Table 2. Application of Deep Learning to Reduce Image Noise or Artifacts.
Study | Year | CT Scans for Test (n) | Low Dose Data | Network | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wolterink et al. [23] | 2017 | 28 | Phantom | GAN | Noise reduction in low-dose CCTA; 3D GAN |
Green et al. [24] | 2018 | 45 | Synthetic data | FCN | Noise reduction in low-dose CCTA; FCN for per voxel prediction |
Lossau et al. [25] | 2019 | 4 | Synthetic data | CNN | Motion artifact recognition and quantification; CNN |
Tatsugami et al. [26] | 2019 | 30 | Synthetic data | CNN | Deep learning–based imaging restoration; lower image noise and better CNR compared with hybrid IR images |
Kang et al. [20] | 2019 | 50 | Patients data with different cardiac phase | GAN | Noise reduction in low-dose CCTA (multiple cardiac phase data); 2D cycle-consistent GAN (CycleGAN) |
Benz et al. [52] | 2020 | 43 | Synthetic data | NA | Comparison between model-based IR and deep-learning image reconstruction in CCTA |
Hong et al. [49] | 2020 | 82 | Synthetic data | FCN | Applying a deep learning–based denoising technique to CCTA along with IR for additional noise reduction |
CCTA = coronary computed tomography angiography, CNN = convolutional neural network, CNR = contrast-to-noise ratio, D = dimensional, FCN = fully convolutional neural network, GAN = generative adversarial network, IR = iterative reconstruction, NA = not available