Skip to main content
. 2021 May 3;48(12):3886–3902. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05362-8

Table 1.

Study and patient characteristics

Authors Country Study design Type of LVV Reference standard for LVV diagnosis No. of [18F]FDG-PET/CT scans (no. of patients) Median or * mean age (yrs) % male CRP/ESR available
Alibaz-Oner et al. (2015) Turkey Prospective Cross sectional TAK ACR criteria 1990 14 (14) 39* 21 No
Banerjee et al. (2020) USA Prospective Longitudinal TAK, GCA ACR criteria 1990 or modifiedcriteria for GCA 156 (52; 21 TAK and 31 GCA) 30 (TAK); 72 (GCA) 24 (TAK); 26 (GCA) Yes
Bruls et al. (2016) Belgium Prospective Longitudinal TAK, GCA, aortitis Clinical, biochemical, biopsyand PET/CT results + ACRcriteria 1990 (n = 4) 45 (15; 2 TAK, 4 GCA, 6 aortitis, 3 other) 65* total population 44 total population No
Castellani et al. (2016) Italy Retrospective Cross sectional and longitudinal TAK, GCA Not specified 41 (21; 5 TAK and 16 GCA) 61* TAK; 70* GCA 33 total population; 33 (TAK); 22 (GCA) Yes
de Boysson et al. (2017) France Retrospective Longitudinal GCA ACR criteria 1990 or 2 ACRcriteria in combinationwith PET/CT positivity 59 (25) 69 32 Yes
Grayson et al. (2018) USA Prospective Cross sectional TAK, GCA ACR criteria 1990 or modified criteria for GCA 115 (56; 26 TAK and 30 GCA) 31* TAK, 69* GCA 31 (TAK); 30 (GCA) Yes
Henes et al. (2011) Germany Retrospective Longitudinal TAK, GCA Clinical 36 (10; 4 TAK and 6 GCA) 48 (TAK); 63 (GCA) 20 Yes
Incerti et al. (2017) Italy Retrospective Cross sectional TAK ACR criteria 1990 30 (30) 43 13 Yes
Lee et al. (2012) South Korea Retrospective Longitudinal TAK ACR criteria 1990 (CTA or MRAinstead of conventional angiography) 53 (38) with 13 (13) used in systematic review 43* 11 Yes
Li et al. (2019) China Prospective Cross sectional TAK ACR criteria 1990 (CTA or MRAinstead of conventional angiography) 22 (71) 34* total population; 34* PET-CT group 16 total population; 23 PET-CT group Yes
Martinez-Rodriguez et al. (2018) Spain Retrospective Longitudinal GCA, aortitis ACR criteria 1990 74 (37) 67* 24 Yes
Nielsen et al. (2018) Denmark Prospective Longitudinal GCA Clinical, biochemical, biopsy,FDG results and ACR criteria 1990 48 (24) 69* 33 Yes
Park et al. (2018) South Korea Prospective Longitudinal TAK ACR criteria 1990 22 (11) 47* 0 Yes
Quinn et al. (2018) USA Prospective Cross sectional TAK, GCA ACR criteria 1990 or modifiedcriteria for GCA 114 (65; 30 TAK and 35 GCA) 33* TAK; 68* GCA 33 (TAK); 20 (GCA) Yes
Regola et al. (2020) Italy Retrospective Longitudinal GCA ACR criteria 1990 or biopsyor FDG results 30 (32) with 22 (11) used in a systematic review 74 total population; PET-CT group not specified 22 total population; r PET-CT group not specified Yes
Rimland et al. (2020) USA Prospective Cross sectional and longitudinal TAK, GCA ACR criteria 1990 ormodified criteria for GCA 240 (112; 56 TAK and 56 GCA) 34 (TAK); 71 (GCA) 20 (TAK); 21 (GCA) Yes
Sammel et al. (2020) Australia Prospective Longitudinal GCA Biopsy and clinical follow-up for > 6 months 36 (21) with 30 (15) included in systematic review 73 total population; 71 for dual time-point 33 Yes
Santhosh et al. (2014) India Retrospective Cross sectional TAK ACR criteria 1990 60 (51) with 43 (38) included in systematic review Total population not reported; 30* patients at diagnosis 25 No
Schramm et al. (2019) Germany Retrospective Cross sectional TAK, GCA ACR criteria 1990 and imaging 80 (62) including 52 FDG-PET/CT scans without CT Not reported Not reported Yes
Tezuka et al. (2012) Japan Retrospective Cross sectional TAK ACR criteria 1990 and guideline for the management of vasculitissyndrome (Japanese circulationsociety 2008) 39 (39) with 29 (29) included in a systematic review 30 10 Yes
Vitiello et al. (2018) Italy Retrospective Longitudinal GCA ACR criteria 1990 24 (12) 69* 33 Yes

GCA, giant cell arteritis; LVV, large vessel vasculitis; TAK, Takayasu arteritis; * mean age is provided rather than median age.

* mean age is provided rather than median age