Skip to main content
. 2021 May 12;110(10):1637–1646. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01865-4

Table 3.

Multivariate linear regression analysis: EAT and infarct size at baseline, 12 weeks and myocardial salvage index

Predictors of endpoint Infarct size (baseline), g B (95% CI) p-value Infarct size, g (12 weeks) B (95% CI) p-value Myocardial salvage index, g B (95% CI) p-value
Anterior infarction 7.17 ( – 5.18; 19.52) 0.248 1.49 ( – 6.70; 9.68) 0.715 0.02 ( – 0.08, 0.12) 0.645
TIMI-flow pre PCI* 11.71 ( – 3.85; 27.26) 0.136 6.69 ( – 3.63; 17.01) 0.198  – 0.02 ( – 0.14, 0.11) 0.761
TIMI-flow post PCI**  – 2.24 ( – 23.63; 19.15) 0.834 3.25 ( – 10.94; 17.43) 0.646  – 0.11 ( – 0.28,  – 0.06) 0.214
AHI*** 3.07 ( – 9.13; 15.26) 0.614 9.39 (1.20; 17.38) 0.025  – 0.20 ( – 0.30,  – 0.10)  0.001
Epicardial adipose tissue, ml 0.49 (0.09; 0.90) 0.017 0.38 (0.11; 0.64) 0.006 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) 0.420
Time to balloon, min 0.11 ( – 0.61; 0.84) 0.751 0.17 ( – 0.31; 0.65) 0.477 0.00 ( – 0.01; 0.01) 0.771
Diabetes mellitus**** 4.78 ( – 9.60; 19.16) 0.506 4.86 ( – 4.68; 14.40) 0.310  – 0.06 ( – 0.17; 0.06) 0.313
Model summary***** R2 = 0.478, F = 3.503 R2 = 0.604, F = 5.828 R2 = 0.524, F = 4.195

AHI apnea–hypopnea-index, EAT epicardial adipose tissue, B regression coefficient, CI confidence interval, TIMI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction

*TIMI grade 0 vs TIMI grade 1

**TIMI grade 2 vs TIMI grade 3, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention

***AHI, stratified in ≥ 15/h and < 15/h

****Diabetes mellitus yes and no

*****All models controlled for age, sex, BMI and heart volume, significant p values (p < 0.05) marked in bold