Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 24;147(11):3313–3324. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03745-w

Table 5.

Impact of HMGA2 expression pattern on survival of PDAC patient

Staining parameter Total number of patients Number of deceased patients Median survival ± SD (95% CI) in months p-value
Intensity cytoplasm
 Negative 11 9 15 ± 8.268 (0.000–31.205)
 Weakly to strongly positive 86 69 15 ± 1.558 (11.946–18.054) 0.395
Number of cells with positively stained cytoplasm
 ≤ 80% 41 35 15 ± 2.403 (10.291–19.709)
 > 80% 56 43 15 ± 3.453 (8.233–21.767) 0.687
Sum score cytoplasm
 ≤ 4 41 35 15 ± 2.403 (10.291–19.709)
 > 4 56 43 15 ± 3.453 (8.233–21.767) 0.687
Staining intensity nuclei
Negative to weakly positive 72 55 16 ± 1.952 (12.174–19.826)
Moderately to strongly positive 25 23 8 ± 2.359 (3.375–12.625) 0.045
Number of cells with positively stained nucleus
 ≤ 80% 47 39 15 ± 1.217 (12.614–17.386)
 > 80% 50 39 17 ± 6.635 (5.956–28.044) 0.591
Sum score nuclei
 ≤ 4 28 22 19 ± 2.531 (14.039–23.961)
 > 4 69 56 15 ± 1.892 (11.293–18.707) 0.230

p-values were estimated by log-rank-test with p ≤ 0.05 considered as significant and represented in bold numbers

SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval