Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 30;11:19362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98138-x

Table 2.

Content characteristics in Study 1 and 2 assessed manually by rater (top) and with Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) software (bottom).

Study 1 Study 2 Study 1–Study 2 differences
Mean SD Median Mean SD Median Significance test P-value
Thought Content: Manual ratings
% Internal 73% 17% 74% 74% 20% 76% W = 674 0.88
% External / Perceptually-coupled 24% 15% 23% 23% 19% 21% W = 727.50 0.69
% Interoceptive 3% 3% 1% 3% 4% 1% W = 683.50 0.96
% Past 17% 11% 17% 17% 15% 12% W = 782.50 0.33
% Present 50% 21% 50% 45% 22% 44% W = 755.50 0.48
% Future 21% 18% 17% 27% 15% 25% W = 519 0.076
% Atemporal 12% 10% 10% 11% 12% 8% W = 776 0.36
Valence (-5 to 5 scale) − 0.15 0.47 − .0.16 − 0.18 0.81 − 0.09 t = 0.20 0.84
Self-focus (0 to 4 scale) 2.18 0.72 2.13 2.18 0.61 2.21 t = − .0.05 0.96
Thought Content: Linguistic analysis with LIWC
% Use of personal pronoun “I” 9.72 2.74 9.55 9.75 2.78 9.93 t = − .0.05 0.96
% Positive emotion words 2.63 1.19 2.46 3.09 1.44 2.81 t = − 1.50 0.14
% Negative emotion words 1.78 1.06 1.71 1.75 .96 1.52 t = .0.10 0.92
% Past-related words 3.41 1.31 3.49 3.04 1.2 2.89 t = 1.23 0.23

Statistical differences between Study 1 and 2 were evaluated with a two-tailed Welch t-test for normally distributed variables and a Wilcoxon rank-sum test for non-normally distributed variables. MNW Mean Number of Words.