Table 3.
Change from baseline in signs of atrophogenicity by visit (safety population)
| Treatment | Baseline atrophy score | Change from baseline in signs of atrophogenicity by visit: Atrophy score | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visit 3 (day 7), n (%) | Visit 4 (day 14), n (%) | Visit 5 (day 21), n (%) | ||||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Clobetasol propionate 0.025% formulation 5 | 0 (n = 26) | 25 (96.2) | 0 | 0 | 20 (76.9) | 1 (3.8) | 0 | 17 (65.4) | 2 (7.7) | 0 |
| 1 (n = 3) | 0 | 3 (100) | 0 | 0 | 3 (100.0) | 0 | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) | 0 | |
| Clobetasol propionate 0.025% formulation 13 | 0 (n = 23) | 22 (95.7) | 0 | 0 | 15 (65.2) | 2 (8.7) | 0 | 12 (52.2) | 3 (13.0) | 0 |
| 1 (n = 5) | 1 (20.0) | 4 (80.0) | 0 | 4 (80.0) | 1 (20.0) | 0 | 4 (80.0) | 1 (20.0) | 0 | |
| 2 (n = 1) | 0 | 0 | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 0 | 0 | 1 (100) | 0 | 0 | |
| Clobetasol propionate 0.05% cream | 0 (n = 26) | 22 (84.6) | 0 | 0 | 16 (61.5) | 1 (3.8) | 0 | 11 (42.3) | 2 (7.7) | 1 (3.8) |
| 1 (n = 4) | 1 (25.0) | 3 (75.0) | 0 | 2 (50) | 2 (50.0) | 0 | 4 (100) | 0 | 0 | |
| Treatment | Baseline telangiectasia score | Change from baseline in signs of atrophogenicity by visit: Telangiectasia score | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visit 3 (day 7), n (%) | Visit 4 (day 14), n (%) | Visit 5 (day 21), n (%) | ||||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Clobetasol propionate 0.025% formulation 5 | 0 (n = 29) | 28 (96.6) | 0 | 0 | 24 (82.8) | 0 | 0 | 20 (69.0) | 2 (6.9) | 0 |
| Clobetasol propionate 0.025% formulation 13 | 0 (n = 28) | 27 (96.4) | 0 | 0 | 21 (75.0) | 1 (3.6) | 0 | 17 (60.7) | 3 (10.7) | 0 |
| 2 (n = 1) | 0 | 0 | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 0 | 0 | 1 (100) | 0 | 0 | |
| TMV cream | 0 (n = 30) | 26 (86.7) | 0 | 0 | 21 (70.0) | 0 | 0 | 16 (53.3) | 2 (6.7) | 0 |
0, none; 1, slight; 2, moderate; 3, pronounced; 4, very pronounced.