TABLE 2.
No. | Metabolites | Formula | Mass (m/z) | Retention time (min) | Fold changea | p value | VIP valueb | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Con vs. IMQ | IMQ vs. ESW | Con vs. IMQ | IMQ vs. ESW | Con vs. IMQ | IMQ vs. ESW | |||||
1 | Ureac | CH4N2O | 132.10 | 6.61 | 0.75 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 1.14 | 1.15 |
2 | Glycinec | C2H5NO2 | 174.20 | 6.72 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 2.24 | 3.65 |
3 | 2-Butenedioic acidc | C4H4O4 | 204.20 | 7.91 | 1.14 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 1.00 | 2.57 | 0.02 |
4 | L-Threoninec | C4H9NO3 | 291.28 | 8.23 | 0.87 | 1.03 | 0.04 | 0.76 | 1.01 | 0.24 |
5 | Fructosec | C6H12O6 | 326.20 | 11.86 | 3.07 | 0.43 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 1.49 | 1.32 |
6 | Heptanoic acidc | C7H14O2 | 73.12 | 14.44 | 1.27 | 0.92 | 0.01 | 0.38 | 1.29 | 0.58 |
7 | L-Ascorbic acidd | C6H8O6 | 72.20 | 16.24 | 0.23 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 1.46 | 1.56 |
8 | Quinolinec | C9H7N | 305.25 | 18.29 | 1.53 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 5.26 | 1.47 |
9 | D-Glucosed | C6H12O6 | 204.20 | 16.48 | 2.25 | 2.38 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 2.93 | 1.56 |
10 | L-Prolined | C5H9NO2 | 142.20 | 7.16 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 1.99 | 2.49 |
11 | Pyrimidined | C4H4N2 | 241.20 | 7.66 | 0.69 | 1.85 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.48 | 4.07 |
12 | Phosphoric acidd | H3PO4 | 357.2 | 13.14 | 0.34 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
13 | L-Valinee | C5H11NO2 | 144.20 | 6.05 | 1.06 | 0.86 | 0.45 | 0.05 | 0.83 | 2.59 |
14 | Malic acide | C4H6O5 | 232.20 | 9.95 | 0.92 | 1.15 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 2.56 | 4.82 |
15 | L-Phenylalaninee | C9H11NO2 | 192.20 | 11.33 | 1.36 | 0.67 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 1.03 | 1.85 |
16 | d-Mannosee | C6H12O6 | 179.20 | 15.12 | 1.02 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 3.22 |
17 | Z,Z-9,12-Octadecadienoic acide | C18H32O2 | 253.20 | 20.35 | 3.71 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.76 | 1.34 |
Fold change with a value >1 indicated a relatively higher intensity, whereas a value <1 indicated a relatively lower intensity.
VIP value was obtained from the OPLS-DA model.
Variables were obtained by comparing Con vs. IMQ (VIP >1 and p < 0.05).
Variables were obtained by comparing IMQ vs. Con and ESW (VIP >1 and p < 0.05).
Variables were obtained by comparing IMQ vs. ESW (VIP >1 and p < 0.05).