TABLE 3.
No | Metabolites | Formula | Retention time (min) | Mass (m/z) | Fold changea | p value | VIP valueb | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Con vs. IMQ | IMQ vs. ESW | Con vs. IMQ | IMQ vs. ESW | Con vs. IMQ | IMQ vs. ESW | |||||
1 | Myo-inositolc | C6H12O6 | 29.16 | 313.39 | 1.43 | 1.27 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.95 | 1.15 |
2 | Z,Z-9,12-Octadecadienoic acidd | C18H32O2 | 32.23 | 339.40 | 1.62 | 1.28 | 0.02 | 0.47 | 1.06 | 0.26 |
3 | Cholesterold | C27H46O | 42.00 | 129.10 | 1.61 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.97 | 2.01 | 0.12 |
4 | d-Galactosec | C6H12O6 | 25.97 | 179.17 | 0.46 | 6.94 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 1.01 | 1.24 |
5 | d-Mannosee | C6H12O6 | 26.20 | 321.30 | 1.15 | 1.82 | 0.88 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.62 |
6 | D-Glucosee | C6H12O6 | 28.76 | 204.20 | 0.40 | 3.33 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.99 | 1.12 |
Fold change with a value >1 indicated a relatively higher intensity, whereas a value <1 indicated a relatively lower intensity.
VIP value was obtained from the OPLS-DA model.
Variables were obtained by comparing IMQ vs. Con and ESW (VIP >1 and p < 0.05).
Variables were obtained by comparing Con vs. IMQ (VIP >1 and p < 0.05).
Variables were obtained by comparing IMQ vs. ESW (VIP >1 and p < 0.05).