TABLE 3.
Formulation strategies used for delivery of disulfiram for cancer treatment.
| Formulation | Components and technique used | Cancer indication | Cell lines/models | Study outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymers | |||||
| DSF encapsulated mixed nanoparticles | mPEG5000-PCL5000, PCL5000, MCT and DSF – High pressure homogenization method | Mouse hepatocellular adenocarcinoma | H22 xenograft tumor model | • Increased Drug loading and stability | Zhuo et al. (2018) |
| • Higher degree of tumor necrosis and tumor inhibition in animal models | |||||
| DSF encapsulated PLGA nanoparticles | PVA, PLGA, DSF Nanoprecipitation method | Breast Cancer | MCF7 cell lines | • Significantly enhanced stability when compared to free drug in serum solution (10% FBS) | Fasehee et al. (2017) |
| • Enhanced cytotoxicity compared to free drug | |||||
| Folate receptor targeted PLGA-PEG nanoparticles encapsulated with DSF | PLGA, (PEG)-bis amine, PVA, Folate, DSF Nanoprecipitation method | Breast cancer | MCF7 and 4T1 cell lines, BALB/c mice models | • Showed a higher degree of cytotoxicity compared to free drug and non-folate formulations | Fasehee et al. (2016) |
| • Significant decrease of tumor size in mouse models | |||||
| Combination of polyethylene glycol-cisplatin complex and DSF encapsulated nanoparcticles | mPEG-PLGA/PCL, PGA, DSF, Cisplatin | Lung cancer | A549 and A549DDP cell lines. BALB/c mouse model | • synergistically enhanced the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin in vitro | Song et al. (2016) |
| • The combination effectively inhibited the tumor growth and displayed excellent safety in mouse models | |||||
| PLGA encapsulated DSF Nanoparticles | PVA, PLGA, DSF. emulsion-solvent evaporation method | Lung cancer | A549 cell lines | • enhanced half-life in serum | Najlah et al. (2017) |
| • Higher cytotoxicity compared to free DSF in vitro | |||||
| Brain tumor-penetrating disulfiram nanoparticles | mPEG, PLGA, DSF. emulsion-solvent evaporation method | Brain cancer | T98G and DAOY cell lines and Female CD-1 mice, female athymic nude (nu/nu) mice, and the triple immune-deficient NCG mice models | • Enhanced delivery of DSF to the brain tumor site and increased stability | Madala et al. (2018) |
| • Potent cytotoxic and anti-clonogenic activities | |||||
| Lipid based nanoparticles | |||||
| Liposome encapsulated formulation of DSF | PC, CHOL, PG Thin film hydration to form multilamellar vesicles subject to size reduction -100–300 nm | Breast Cancer | MCF7, MDA-MB-231, T47D S180 mouse sarcoma models - BALB/c mice. MDA breast cancer models -CD1 Nu/Nu mice | • Selective targeting of cancer cells, induction of apoptosis | (EP2648709B1, 2011; Liu et al., 2014) |
| • Enhanced efficacy of conventional anticancer drugs | |||||
| • Target cancer stem cells- reduction in CSC markers and clonogenicity | |||||
| • Protection of thiol group in vivo, react with Cu to exert anticancer activity in mouse models of sarcoma and breast cancer | |||||
| Co-encapsulated liposomal formulation of Doxorubicin and DSF | DSPC, CHOL, mPEG2000-DSPE. Thin film hydration method | Breast cancer | MCF7, MDA-MB-231 | • Decrease in Pgp expression and reversal of Pgp mediated drug resistance | Rolle et al. (2020) |
| • Enhanced efficacy of DOX | |||||
| DSF entrapped vitamin E-TPGS-modified PEGylated nanostructured lipid carriers | Lecithin, Precirol® ATO, Labrafac Lipophile WL134, DSF. Emulsification ultrasonication method | Breast cancer | MCF7, 4T1, BALB/C mouse models | • Enhanced long term stability | Banerjee et al. (2019) |
| • Higher toxicity compared to free drug in vitro | |||||
| • Significant increase in tumor inhibition with no toxicity in vivo | |||||
| PEGylated Liposome Encapsulating DSF | HSPC, DPPC, CHOL, DSPE-PEG2000, DSF. Ethanol-based proliposome technology | Colorectal cancer | H630-WT and H630-R10 | • Significantly improved serum stability | Najlah et al. (2019) |
| • Cytotoxic to colorectal cancer cell lines in presence of copper in vitro | |||||
| Micelle based nanoparticles | |||||
| pH triggered polymeric micelles for the co-delivery of paclitaxel/disulfiram | Methoxy PEG-b-PLL, DMA, PTX and DSF. Nanoprecipitation method | Breast Cancer | MCF7 and MAF7/ADR | • Enhanced internalization of nanoparticles into tumor cells | Huo et al. (2017) |
| • Inhibition of Pgp transport function | |||||
| DSF encapsulated micelles | mPEG5k-b-PLGA2k/PCL3.4 k/MCT, DSF solvent diffusion method | Liver cancer | H22 xenograft mouse model | • Increased stability and bioavailability in plasma | Miao et al. (2018) |
| • Enhanced tumor inhibition in mouse model | |||||
| DSF loaded redox-sensitive shell crosslinked micelles | SMA micelles were crosslinked by adding cystamine dihydrochloride and sodium bicarbonate | Breast cancer | 4T1 | • Significant tumour inhibition | Duan et al. (2014) |
| • Increased Stability | |||||
| Other Nanoparticle delivery systems | |||||
| DSF- loaded magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles | PEI-FA, Fe3O4@mSiO2 Np’s, DSF Thermal decomposition and Sol gel reaction method | Breast Cancer | MCF7 | • Exhibited selective toxicity to tumor cells | Solak et al. (2021) |
| • Highly cytotoxic in the presence of copper | |||||
| Cu(DDC)2 and regorafenib encapsulated BSA nanoparticles | Denaturing of BSA by urea to induce nanoparticle formulation | Glioma | H22 | • Improved stability and increased efficacy against resistant xenografted tumors | Zhao et al. (2018) |
| DSF loaded gold nanorods | Seed solution preparation and surface PEG modification | Breast Cancer | MCF-7 | • Improved circulation time, increased tumor accumulation, tumor shrinkage in vivo | Xu et al. (2020a) |
| Cyclodextrin Cu(DDC)2 | SBE-CD and HP-CD were the cyclodextrins used | Breast cancer | MDA-MB231 | • Stability for 28 days, retained anti-cancer properties of Cu(DDC)2 | Said Suliman et al. (2021) |