Table 5.
Multilevel logistic regression results for generating adjusted inequalities, Most-developed region
| Full sample | Rural sample | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Odds Ratio (95%CI) |
p value |
Odds Ratio (95%CI) |
p value | |
| Individual-level indicators | ||||
| Age month | 0•98 | 0•99 | ||
| (0•97,1•00) | 0•0129 | (0•97,1•00) | 0•0642 | |
| Gender/sex | ||||
| boy | Ref | Ref | ||
| girl | 1•45 | <0•0001 | 1•43 | <0•0001 |
| (1•35,1•56) | (1•33,1•55) | |||
| Family annual income | ||||
| less than 60,000 RMB | Ref | Ref | ||
| 60,000-100,000 RMB | 1•24 | 0•0004 | 1•21 | 0•0016 |
| (1•10,1•40) | (1•07,1•36) | |||
| 100,000-150,000 RMB | 1•48 | <0•0001 | 1•44 | <0•0001 |
| (1•27,1•73) | (1•23,1•67) | |||
| more than 150,000 RMB | 1•96 | <0•0001 | 1•88 | <0•0001 |
| (1•60,2•39) | (1•54,2•29) | |||
| Maternal schooling | ||||
| middle school or under | Ref | Ref | ||
| high school | 1•30 | 0•0003 | 1•36 | <0•0001 |
| (1•13,1•50) | (1•19,1•56) | |||
| some college | 1•41 | <0•0001 | 1•42 | <0•0001 |
| (1•22,1•62) | (1•22,1•66) | |||
| college or above | 1•69 | <0•0001 | 1•63 | <0•0001 |
| (1•41,2•04) | (1•39,1•91) | |||
| Divorced family | ||||
| non-divorced family | Ref | Ref | ||
| divorced family | 0•91 | 0•3902 | 0•99 | 0• 9489 |
| (0•74,1•12) | (0•79,1•24) | |||
| Hukou | ||||
| urban | Ref | |||
| rural | 0•83 | 0•0007 | ||
| (0•74,0•92) | ||||
| Primary caregiver | ||||
| parents | Ref | |||
| grandparents or others | 0•64 | <0•0001 | ||
| (0•56,0•72) | ||||
| Leftbehind children | ||||
| non-leftbehind children | Ref | |||
| leftbehind children | 0•69(0.54,0.89) | 0•0100 | ||
| _cons | 5•56(3•68, 8•42) | <0•0001 | 3•83(2•42, 6•06) | <0•0001 |
| District-level indicators | ||||
| District/county | 1•06 | 0•0005 | 1•07 | 0• 0005 |
| (1•02,1•09) | (1•03,1•11) | |||
| Sample | All | Rural | ||
| Observations | 18,995 | 12,364 | ||
| Number of groups | 29 | 29 | ||