Table 2.
Fake news detection studies made by using ANN-based supervised learning algorithms.
Refs. | Dataset | ML | Success ML | Performance measure | Best result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[79] | Kaggle open source dataset of fake | LR, RNN, GRU, | GRU | F1-score | 0.84 |
news article and signalmedia open | LSTM, BiLSTM, | ||||
source dataset of not fake news article. | CNN | ||||
[80] | Using a set of articles flagged as false by | KNN, SVM, | LSTM | F1-score | 0.90 |
Snopes, and a set of real articles from news | LSTM | ||||
organizations such as NDTV, CNN etc.. | |||||
[81] | FNC-1 open source dataset of articles | LSTM, GRU | GRU | FNC-score | 69.08 |
[82] | The form of (headline, body) pairs from | RNN, LSTM, | BiLSTM | Accuracy | 0.84 |
leading news organizations such as | BiLSTM, GRU, | ||||
NDTV, CNN etc.. | BiGRU | ||||
[83] | FNC-1 open source dataset of articles. | MLP | MLP | FNC-score | 83.08 |
[84] | Tweets on Twitter, discussion topics | CSI, DT, SVM, | CSI | Accuracy | 0.95 |
on Weibo and users. | LSTM, GRU | ||||
[85] | 19 fake news article websites (20,372 article) | 3HAN, GRU | 3HAN | Accuracy | 0.97 |
labeled by polifact, 9 real news article | |||||
websites (20,932 article) listed by forbes. | |||||
[86] | Tweets from 174 suspicious propaganda accounts | LR, RNN, | RNN, CNN | F1-score | 0.92 |
identified by PropOrNot and manually constructed | CNN | ||||
a list of 252 trusted news accounts by writers. | |||||
[87] | LIAR open source dataset of articles. | LR, SVM, | CNN | Accuracy | 0.27 |
BiLSTM, CNN | |||||
[88] | LIAR open source dataset of articles. | LR, SVM, RNN, | CNN | Accuracy | 0.27 |
GRU, LSTM, | |||||
Bi-LSTM, CNN | |||||
[89] | Open source dataset from | GRU, LSTM, BiLSTM, | SMHA-CNN | F1-score | 0.96 |
fakenews.mit.edu. | SMHA-CNN |