Table 2.
Fake news detection studies made by using ANN-based supervised learning algorithms.
| Refs. | Dataset | ML | Success ML | Performance measure | Best result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [79] | Kaggle open source dataset of fake | LR, RNN, GRU, | GRU | F1-score | 0.84 |
| news article and signalmedia open | LSTM, BiLSTM, | ||||
| source dataset of not fake news article. | CNN | ||||
| [80] | Using a set of articles flagged as false by | KNN, SVM, | LSTM | F1-score | 0.90 |
| Snopes, and a set of real articles from news | LSTM | ||||
| organizations such as NDTV, CNN etc.. | |||||
| [81] | FNC-1 open source dataset of articles | LSTM, GRU | GRU | FNC-score | 69.08 |
| [82] | The form of (headline, body) pairs from | RNN, LSTM, | BiLSTM | Accuracy | 0.84 |
| leading news organizations such as | BiLSTM, GRU, | ||||
| NDTV, CNN etc.. | BiGRU | ||||
| [83] | FNC-1 open source dataset of articles. | MLP | MLP | FNC-score | 83.08 |
| [84] | Tweets on Twitter, discussion topics | CSI, DT, SVM, | CSI | Accuracy | 0.95 |
| on Weibo and users. | LSTM, GRU | ||||
| [85] | 19 fake news article websites (20,372 article) | 3HAN, GRU | 3HAN | Accuracy | 0.97 |
| labeled by polifact, 9 real news article | |||||
| websites (20,932 article) listed by forbes. | |||||
| [86] | Tweets from 174 suspicious propaganda accounts | LR, RNN, | RNN, CNN | F1-score | 0.92 |
| identified by PropOrNot and manually constructed | CNN | ||||
| a list of 252 trusted news accounts by writers. | |||||
| [87] | LIAR open source dataset of articles. | LR, SVM, | CNN | Accuracy | 0.27 |
| BiLSTM, CNN | |||||
| [88] | LIAR open source dataset of articles. | LR, SVM, RNN, | CNN | Accuracy | 0.27 |
| GRU, LSTM, | |||||
| Bi-LSTM, CNN | |||||
| [89] | Open source dataset from | GRU, LSTM, BiLSTM, | SMHA-CNN | F1-score | 0.96 |
| fakenews.mit.edu. | SMHA-CNN |