Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 1;21:1034. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07075-y

Table 4.

Sensitivity analysis of non-consensus statements in the first round (N = 50)

Statements Scenario 1: ‘Neither agree nor disagree’ excluded in analysis Scenario 2: ‘Neither agree nor disagree’ included in analysis
Consensus Non-consensus Neutral Consensus Non-consensus
Availing case registers specific for registering PC-NTD cases is necessary 35 (70)* 4 (8) 11 (22) 46 (92) 4 (8)
All PC-NTDs need confirmation at the lower surveillance levels 33 (66)* 4 (8) 13 (26) 46 (92) 4 (8)
All health workers need to be involved in training on PC-NTDs surveillance activities 35 (70)* 3 (6) 12 (24) 47 (94) 3 (6)
Increasing the number of designated surveillance focal persons is required 33 (66)* 6 (12) 11 (22) 44 (88) 6 (12)

* - statements not achieving the > 70 % consensus threshold