Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 30;37(5):1173–1183. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12628

TABLE 3.

Comparison of characteristics between arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy patients with the Brugada pattern on electrocardiogram and Brugada syndrome patients

Clinical characteristics ARVC Brugada P value
Age at enrolment (years) 55.0 ± 7.3 52.6 ± 14.7 .73
ECG
PQ interval (ms) 210 (170‐278) 180 (163‐208) .13
QRS duration (ms) 138 ± 25 118 ± 31 .18
Complete right bundle brunch block, n (%) 3 (60) 8 (31) .22
Fragmented QRS, n (%) 3 (60) 8 (31) .22
T‐wave inversion in leads V1‐V3, n (%) 3 (60) 16 (62) .95
T‐wave inversion in leads II/III/aVF, n (%) 1 (20) 3 (12) .62
J wave in inferior/lateral lead, n (%) 1 (20) 4 (15) .80
Positive in SAECG, n (%) 4/4 (100) 8/13 (62) .07
J‐point amplitude of Brugada pattern (mV) 0.29 ± 0.05 0.66 ± 0.33 <.001
S‐wave amplitude of Brugada pattern (mV) 0.34 ± 0.21 0.67 ± 0.39 .017
Episode of VF, n (%) 0 (0) 26 (100) <.001
Episode of monomorphic VT, n (%) 4 (80) 0 (0) <.001

Values are presented as mean ± SD, median (interquartile range), or n (%).

VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia.