TABLE 2.

Individual posterior probability of difference in postprandial blood glucose when participants consumed low-fat high-carbohydrate compared with high-fat low-carbohydrate diets¹

	Posterior probability (%)
	Difference of MPG (mmol/L)		Difference of MAGE (mmol/L)		Difference of AUC24 (mmol/L·h)
Participant No.	<–0.167	>0.167	<–0.072	>0.072	<–13.889	>13.889
1 2	35.4	4.50	83.2	4.37	0	0
2	17.3	28.6	33.0	43.7	0	0
3	0.567	78.5	43.4	21.7	0	0.133
4 2	22.7	37.2	91.6	4.47	0	0
5 3	2.73	63.7	1.70	94.0	0.133	0
6 3	0.367	87.9	12.6	66.5	0	0
7 3	0	99.2	9.87	55.5	0	44.8
8 2	81.0	1.60	83.8	8.60	3.07	0
9	5.17	53.9	28.5	52.9	0	0
10	20.7	17.7	17.2	56.5	0	0
11 2	83.9	0.267	25.1	45.9	1.47	0
12	26.6	23.5	35.1	48.4	0	0
13 2	85.1	0.167	72.6	13.1	0.0333	0
14	63.0	0.600	32.5	43.0	0	0
15	2.73	69.4	6.87	78.3	0	0
16	51.7	7.90	10.5	77.5	24.8	0
17 3	0.0667	83.5	30.2	37.7	0	0
18	67.8	1.77	76.1	10.1	0	0
19 3	0	100	1.77	91.5	0	61.8
20	7.20	55.6	51.8	27.6	0	0
21	41.6	7.53	58.1	16.0	0	0
22 3	0	99.5	2.20	94.2	0	4.17
23 3	0.400	88.7	60.3	21.5	0	22.9
24	47. 7	1.70	34.7	23.1	0	0
25 3	3.13	73.0	4.43	86.4	0	0
26	1.33	70.7	19.6	64.3	0	0
27 3	0.433	86.3	3.03	91.7	0	0
28 2	77.5	0.800	86.8	2.67	2.87	0

¹Values are individual posterior probabilities (applied Bayesian analysis) of reaching a clinically meaningful difference in postprandial blood glucose between LF-HC and HF-LC diets, n = 28. This table reveals the posterior probability of the difference of outcomes between LF-HC and HF-LC periods reaching a clinically meaningful effect (MPG, 0.167 mmol/L; MAGE, 0.072 mmol/L; AUC₂₄, 13.889 mmol/L). HF-LC, high-fat, low-carbohydrate; LF-HC, low-fat, high-carbohydrate; MAGE, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions; MPG, postprandial maximum glucose.

²HF-responders for MPG or MAGE.

³HC-responders for MPG or MAGE.