Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 16;17(4):435–449. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_233_20

Table 6.

Impact of using mesh compared with no mesh on quality of life outcomes

Authors Total number of patients (number followed up) Mean age (years) Length of follow-up (months) Questionnaire used Mesh type Number of patients with mesh n (score) Number of patients without mesh n (score) Impact of mesh on post-operative QoL (P)


Pre-operative score Post-operative score Pre-operative score Post-operative score
Asti et al., 2016 84 (84) 65 24 GERD-HRQL Pre-shaped biosynthetic (Gore Bio™) 41 (15.5) 2 43 (18) 3 P<0.306
Ilyashenko et al., 2018 98 (69) 63 48 GERD-HRQL Non-absorbable self-fixating (ProGrip™) 50 (17.5) 3.8 48 (16.3) 5.9 P<0.0001
Wang et al., 2019 55 65 n/a GERD-HRQL;
SF-36
Porcine urinary bladder matrix n/a 32 (13.2*; 15) n/a 33 (11.2*; 14) P=0.5235*
P=0.7182
Dallemagne et al., 2011 85 (64) 66 118 GIQLI Variable n/a 120 n/a 114 P=0.075
Koetje et al., 2015 126 (91) x 24 SF-36 Absorbable (Surgisis; n=41), Non-absorbable (Timesh; n=42) n/a 83 n/a 43 Not significant
Oelschlager et al., 2011 108 (72) 64 58 SF-36 Biologic mesh Group (Surgisis) n/a 44
47§
n/a 44
49§
P=1.0
P=0.6§

*GERD-HRQL, SF-36, PCS, §MCS. GERD-HRQL: Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life, SF: Short Form health surveys, PCS: Physical component summary, MCS: Mental component summary, GIQLI: Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, QOL: Quality of life, n/a: Not available