TABLE 3.

Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis Predicting SEFQ Negative Expressiveness Subscales

	SEFQ Negative-Submissive						SEFQ Negative-Dominant
Variable	Model 1			Model 2			Model 1			Model 2
	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β
Covariates
SES	−.02	.04	−.05	−.01	.04	−.01	−.02	.04	− .05	−.02	.04	−.04
Marital status	−.41	.26	−.14	−.31	.26	−.10	−.05	.22	−.02	−.01	.22	−.01
Child age	.02	.05	.02	.01	.05	.02	−.10	.05	−.17*	−.10	.05	−.18*
Child gender	−.14	.21	−.05	−.03	.21	−.01	−.14	.18	−.06	−.10	.18	−.04
Ethnicity
AA vs. EA	−.29	.25	−.10	−.32	.34	−.11	−.10	.21	−.04	.07	.29	.03
LA vs. EA	−.11	.30	−.03	1.62	.72	.46*	.08	.26	.03	1.13	.62	.39
Parent gender	.61	.23	.22**	.75	.31	.27*	−.06	.20	−.03	.18	.27	.08
Ethnicity × Parent gender
AA x Parent gender				.21	.48	.06				−.28	.41	−.10
LA x Parent gender				−1.99	.79	−.54*				−1.27	0.68	−.41
R2		.09			.13			.04			.06
F for change in R2		2.05*			3.72*			0.89			1.83

Note. AA =African American, EA = European American, LA = Lumbee American Indian; EA = 0 (reference group) in all analyses; Gender coding: 0=boy, 1=girl; 0=father, 1=mother.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.