TABLE 4.

Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis Predicting CCNES Supportive Reactions

Variable	Model 1			Model 2			Model 3
	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β
Covariates
SES	.04	.03	.10	.04	.03	.11	.04	.03	.09
Marital status	.26	.15	.12	.24	.15	.11	.31	.15	.15*
Child age	.01	.03	.02	.01	.03	.01	.01	.03	.02
Child gender	.19	.12	.10	.08	.18	.04	.29	.18	.15
Ethnicity
AA vs. EA	−.07	.17	−.03	.36	.27	.17	.73	.29	.34*
LA vs. EA	.09	.15	.05	−.06	.29	−.03	.06	.29	.03
Parent gender	.33	.13	.17**	.49	.26	.24	1.00	.29	.50**
Ethnicity X Parent gender
AA x Parent gender				−.65	.32	−.25*	−1.70	.43	−.65**
LA x Parent gender				−.21	.31	−.06	−.81	.40	−.25
Parent gender x Child gender				.25	.25	.11	−.73	.37	−.32
Ethnicity X Child gender
AA x Child gender				−.15	.27	−.06	−.94	.38	−.35*
LA x Child gender				.13	.11	.16	.07	.11	.08
Ethnicity X Parent gender X Child gender
AA x Parent gender x Child gender							2.03	.57	.64**
LA x Parent gender x Child gender							1.14	.50	.27*
R2		.06			.09			.14
F for change in R2		2.52*			1.45			1.39

Note. AA =African American, EA = European American, LA = Lumbee American Indian; EA = 0 (reference group) in all analyses. Gender coding: 0=boy, 1=girl; 0=father, 1=mother.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.