TABLE 5.

Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis Predicting CCNES Nonsupportive Reactions

Variable	Model 1			Model 2			Model 3
	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β
Covariates
SES	−.08	.03	−.20**	−.09	.03	−.22**	−.09	.03	−.21**
Marital status	−.15	.14	−.07	−.13	.14	−.06	−.17	.14	−.08
Child age	.01	.03	.03	.02	.03	.04	.01	.03	.03
Child gender	−.16	.11	−.09	−.03	.17	−.02	−.06	.18	−.03
Ethnicity
AA vs. EA	.32	.16	.15	−.05	.25	−.03	−.07	.28	−.03
LA vs. EA	.07	.15	.04	.16	.28	.08	.10	.28	.05
Parent gender	−.27	.12	−.14*	−.36	.24	−.19	−.55	.28	−.28
Ethnicity X Parent gender
AA x Parent gender				.48	.30	.19	.67	.42	.26
LA x Parent gender				.35	.29	.11	.76	.39	.24
Parent gender x Child gender				−.36	.24	−.16	−.01	.36	−.01
Ethnicity X Child gender
AA x Child gender				.22	.26	.09	.25	.37	.10
LA x Child gender				−.12	.11	−.15	−.09	.11	−.11
Ethnicity X Parent gender X Child gender
AA x Parent gender x Child gender							−.36	.55	−.12
LA x Parent gender x Child gender							−.76	.48	−.18
R2		.11			.1			.14
F for change in R2		4.55**			1.36			1.24

Note. AA =African American, EA = European American, LA = Lumbee American Indian; EA = 0 (reference group) in all analyses; Gender coding: 0=boy, 1=girl; 0=father, 1=mother.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.