Table 9.
Performance comparison of different models.
| MAPE | RMSE | MAE | IR(MAPE) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPNN | 1 | 4.40% | 616.4990 | 475.5733 | – |
| 2 | 3.94% | 625.7280 | 428.3586 | 10.45% | |
| 3 | 2.24% | 294.0954 | 254.1759 | 49.09% | |
| 4 | 1.69% | 262.4757 | 190.5080 | 61.59% | |
| MLR | 1 | 5.10% | 847.4493 | 545.5473 | – |
| 2 | 5.37% | 907.5902 | 574.5642 | −5.29% | |
| 3 | 16.70% | 2.4171e+03 | 1.8282e+03 | −227.45% | |
| 4 | 12.18% | 1.6593e+03 | 1.3454e+03 | −138.82% | |
| SVM | 1 | 3.59% | 504.9028 | 398.3374 | – |
| 2 | 4.16% | 609.1765 | 738.3157 | −15.88% | |
| 3 | 2.04% | 293.7686 | 230.5830 | 43.18% | |
| 4 | 1.44% | 213.6692 | 163.0783 | 59.89% | |
| LSTM | 1 | 4.23% | 738.3157 | 447.6391 | – |
| 2 | 4.28% | 589.7330 | 485.2420 | −1.18% | |
| 3 | 3.40% | 477.3984 | 369.1028 | 19.62% | |
| 4 | 2.93% | 649.7016 | 339.4954 | 30.73% | |
| RNN | 1 | 3.84% | 500.2649 | 424.0437 | – |
| 2 | 3.61% | 627.1218 | 387.3984 | 5.99% | |
| 3 | 3.37% | 691.9704 | 394.2134 | 12.24% | |
| 4 | 3.06% | 433.1777 | 337.4889 | 20.31% |