Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Jul 24;189:431–442. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.07.002

Table 2.

Life satisfaction in wave t stratified by interview status in the following wave

Percent Distribution Average Life Satisfaction

Response status in following wave 65–74 75–84 85+ All 65–74 75–84 85+ All

1. Interviewed, value reported 88.7 81.9 63.0 83.1 3.93 3.97 4.02 3.96
[0.008] [0.011] [0.019] [0.007]

2–4. Interviewed, no value reported
 2. Item non-response 0.6 0.9 1.5 0.8 3.61*** 3.82* 3.87 3.75***
[0.089] [0.086] [0.113] [0.055]
 3. Proxy interview, no cognitive limitation 0.9 1.1 1.7 1.1 3.98 3.87 3.90 3.92
[0.069] [0.081] [0.090] [0.046]
 4. Proxy interview, cognitive limitations 0.7 2.5 6.8 2.1 3.80 3.88* 3.82*** 3.84***
[0.092] [0.048] [0.052] [0.033]
 All, rows 2–4 2.2 4.5 10.0 4.0 3.82** 3.87*** 3.84*** 3.85***
[0.048] [0.038] [0.042] [0.024]

5. Not interviewed, alive 4.8 5.0 4.8 4.9 3.86** 3.9** 3.89** 3.88***
[0.029] [0.035] [0.061] [0.021]
6. Not interviewed, dead 4.3 8.6 22.3 8.1 3.61*** 3.7*** 3.86*** 3.73***
[0.034] [0.029] [0.029] [0.017]

All, rows 2–6 11.3 18.1 37.1 17.0 3.76*** 3.79*** 3.86*** 3.80***
[0.020] [0.019] [0.022] [0.012]

All 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 3.91 3.94 3.96 3.93
[0.008] [0.010] [0.016] [0.006]

Number of observations 20,246 14,365 4,849 39,460

Notes: The square brackets show the standard errors of the means that are adjusted for clustering at the person-level. The stars indicate statistically significant differences from the mean in row 1.

***

p<0.01

**

p<0.05

*

p<0.1.