Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 19;10:e67509. doi: 10.7554/eLife.67509

Table 1. How the total carbon biomass estimates by phylum from Bar-On et al., 2018 compare to the implied biomass estimates from this study.

All biomass estimates are carbon biomass, and the proportions are of total biomass with respect to the study. The proportion of biomass in this study compared to the Bar-On et al. estimates Bar-On et al., 2018 indicates chordates are overrepresented and arthropods are underrepresented in the present study; the factor that each phylum is overrepresented is given in the eighth column. Total species by phylum estimates are from Reaka-Kudla et al., 1996; Nicol, 1969; Zhang, 2013; Chapman, 2009. The ratio column is the ratio of total biomass implied by the Nc estimates of each species in a phylum to the actual biomass of that phylum.

Bar-On et al. Present study
phylum total species (T) biomass (B) prop. biomass biomass (b) prop. biomass num. species (n) factor overrepresented prop. total species (f=n/T) factor (b/f⁢B)
Arthropoda 1.26 × 106 1.20 0.4635 2.80 × 10−4 0.0102 68 0.02 5.41 × 10−5 4.31
Chordata 5.41 × 104 0.87 0.3357 2.67 × 10−2 0.9715 68 2.89 1.26 × 10−3 24.40
Annelida 1.70 × 104 0.20 0.0772 1.23 × 10−5 0.0004 3 0.01 1.76 × 10−4 0.35
Mollusca 9.54 × 104 0.20 0.0772 4.56 × 10–4 0.0166 13 0.21 1.36 × 10−4 16.70
Cnidaria 1.60 × 104 0.10 0.0386 3.07 × 10−5 0.0011 2 0.03 1.25 × 10−4 2.45
Nematoda 2.50 × 104 0.02 0.0077 4.03 × 10−6 0.0001 1 0.02 4.00 × 10−5 5.03