Table 2. Included Study Demographic Information.
Study | Intervention Details | Study Design | Participants (n) | Age (Years) | Gender | Sport | Outcome Measures |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Haroy, J et al., 201719 | CA performed on both sides compared to Nordic Hamstring. Intervention performed 3x per week for 8 weeks with 1 set per side, progressing from 3-5 reps to 12-15 reps from beginner to advanced athletes. | RCT | 33 | Control Group - 16.9 ± 1.0 | 100 % Male | Soccer | EHAD |
Intervention Group- 16.7 ± 0.9 | |||||||
Ishoi, L et al., 201621 | CA performed both sides compared to control group with no intervention. Intervention performed 2x per week for 8 weeks, progressing from 2 sets of 6 reps per side each session to 3 sets of 15 reps per side each session | Cluster RCT | 20 | Control - 17.4 (17-18)* | 100 % Male | Soccer | EHAD |
Intervention - 17.3 (17-18)* | EHAB | ||||||
EHAD:EHAB | |||||||
Polglass, G et al., 201922 | Modified Progressive CA (MPCA) with no comparison group. MPCA consisted of 6 levels, ranging from an assisted isometric adduction to a full CA exercise. Intervention was performed 2x per week for 8 weeks, progressing from 2 sets of 6 reps per side to 3 sets of 10 reps per side. | Cohort | 17 | 27.4 (20-35)* | 100 % Male | Soccer | EHAD |
EHAB | |||||||
EHAD:EHAB | |||||||
Kohavi, B et al., 201823 | CA compared to sliding hip (SH) exercises and control group with active mobilization. Intervention performed 2x per week for 8 weeks, progressing from 2 sets of 6 reps per side to 4 sets of 9 reps per side. | Prospective RCT | 42 | 17.5 ± 1.1 | 100 % Male | Soccer | EHAD |
EHAB | |||||||
EHAD:EHAB | |||||||
Serner, A et al., 201417 | Examined the EMG activity of 6 different adductor exercises. | Cohort | 35 | 21.4 ± 3.3 | 100 % Male | Soccer | EMG activity |
* = age range; EHAD = eccentric hip adduction strength; EHAB = eccentric hip abduction strength; EMG=electromyography