Table 3. Intergroup comparison according to cure/improvement and positive response rates.
| Group 1 n:29 |
Group 2 n:29 |
P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Success (Positive Response Rate), n (%) | ||||
| Yes | 12 (41.4) | 25 (86.2) | <0.001 | |
| No | 17 (58.6) | 4 (13.8) | ||
| Improvement Rate, n (%) | ||||
| Improvement | 14 (48.3) | 26 (89.7) | ||
| No change | 15 (51.7) | 3 (10.3) | 0.001 | |
| Cure / Improvement Rate, n (%) | ||||
| Cure | 6 (20.7) | 13 (44.8) | ||
| Improvement | 8 (27.6) | 13 (44.8) | ||
| No change | 15 (51.7) | 3 (10.3) | 0.003 | |
Group1, Bladder Training; Group2, Bladder Training + Intravaginal Electrical Stimulation; P, Pearson X2 test.