Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 21;193:104343. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104343

Table A1.

Robustness to Controlling for Other Economic, Education Related and Political Shocks.

(1) (2)
Outcome → Trust in scientists Trust in scientists
Exposure to epidemic (18–25) −1.548***
(0.528)
−1.839***
(0.570)
Observations 30,666 30,666
Outcome → Scientists working for private companies benefit the public Scientists working for private companies benefit the public
Exposure to epidemic (18–25) −0.738
(1.030)
−0.837
(1.167)
Observations 30,273 30,273
Outcome → Scientists working for private companies are honest Scientists working for private companies are honest
Exposure to epidemic (18–25) −2.001***
(0.387)
−2.465***
(0.573)
Observations 28,789 28,789
Outcome → Scientists working for universities benefit the public Scientists working for universities benefit the public
Exposure to epidemic (18–25) −2.616***
(0.634)
−2.684***
(0.748)
Observations 30,067 30,067
Outcome → Scientists working for universities are honest Scientists working for universities are honest
Exposure to epidemic (18–25) −4.007***
(1.183)
−3.841***
(1.214)
Observations 28,437 28,437
Outcome → Scientists find out accurate information Scientists find out accurate information
Exposure to epidemic (18–25) −1.551***
(0.373)
−0.974**
(0.456)



Observations 30,980 30,980
Country fixed effects Yes Yes
Cohort fixed effects Yes Yes
Demographic characteristics Yes Yes
Income quintile fixed effects Yes Yes
Labour market controls Yes Yes
Country-specific age trends Yes Yes
Past controls (18–25) No Yes

Notes: Results use the Gallup sampling weights and robust standard errors are clustered at the country level. Source: Wellcome Global Monitor, 2018 and EM-DAT International Disaster Database, 1970–2017.

* significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%.