Table 15.
Performance comparison of accuracy (%) of the proposed deep learning models with other deep learning models on the same dataset.
| Methods | Hall mark dataset | AIM dataset |
|---|---|---|
| CNN | 68.55 | 82.17 |
| LSTM | 70.76 | 83.16 |
| BiLSTM | 72.58 | 87.77 |
| CNN-LSTM | 71.81 | 91.98 |
| CNN-BiLSTM | 73.99 | 93.06 |
| Logistic regression | 61.91 | 72.92 |
| NBC | 65.35 | 73.84 |
| SVM | 66.99 | 84.55 |
| BiGRU | 69.34 | 89.98 |
| Proposed method 1: quad channel hybrid LSTM model | 75.98 | 96.72 |
| Proposed method 2: hybrid BiGRU with multihead attention model | 74.71 | 95.76 |