Table 5.
Analysis of results with different optimizers for the proposed quad channel hybrid model.
| Optimizer | Dataset | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1-score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam | Hallmarks | 72.98 | 69.65 | 71.61 | 70.61 |
| AIM | 95.12 | 87.17 | 85.99 | 86.57 | |
|
| |||||
| SGD | Hallmarks | 71.72 | 63.58 | 61.84 | 62.69 |
| AIM | 82.35 | 78.98 | 77.21 | 78.08 | |
|
| |||||
| Nadam | Hallmarks | 71.43 | 65.98 | 63.28 | 64.60 |
| AIM | 86.76 | 72.98 | 72.31 | 72.64 | |
|
| |||||
| AdaGrad | Hallmarks | 70.61 | 61.56 | 60.81 | 61.18 |
| AIM | 94.41 | 85.13 | 85.26 | 85.19 | |