Table 7.
Consolidated results for the best combination values of the proposed quad channel hybrid model.
| Model | Dataset | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1-score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quad channel LSTM | Hallmarks | 75.98 | 71.95 | 70.67 | 71.30 |
| AIM | 96.72 | 88.87 | 86.98 | 87.91 |
Consolidated results for the best combination values of the proposed quad channel hybrid model.
| Model | Dataset | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1-score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quad channel LSTM | Hallmarks | 75.98 | 71.95 | 70.67 | 71.30 |
| AIM | 96.72 | 88.87 | 86.98 | 87.91 |