Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 27;7(3):110–114. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2021.08.001

Table 1.

Comparison of patient characteristics between the romosozumab and denosumab groups at baseline.

Variables; median (Q1, Q3) Romosozumab group (n = 25) Denosumab group (n = 25) P-value
Age, yr 74 (70, 80) 73 (68, 77) 0.497
Disease duration, yr 10 (5, 16) 11 (6, 17) 0.606
Height, cm 151.5 (147, 156) 152.0 (146.5, 154) 0.711
Body weight, kg 47.9 (43, 54) 51.4 (45, 54.6) 0.593
bDMARD use, n (%) 15 (60) 14 (56) 1.000
MTX use, n (%) 16 (64) 13 (52) 0.567
Glucocorticoid use, n (%) 5 (20) 6 (24) 1.000
RF positive, n (%) 15 (60) 18 (72) 0.551
CRP, mg/dL 0.16 (0.03, 0.69) 0.06 (0.04, 0.15) 0.122
DAS28-ESR 2.68 (2.05, 3.52) 2.75 (2.22, 3.5) 0.769
HAQ-DI 0.25 (0, 1) 0.375 (0, 0.5) 0.902
Cr-eGFR, mL/min/1.73m2 68.3 (57, 75.4) 61.3 (20.275, 77.55) 0.503
Serum calcium level, mg/dL 9.4 (9.2, 9.6) 9.3 (9, 9.55) 0.084
Prior osteoporosis treatment, n (%) 11 (44) 13 (52) 0.572
 Bisphosphonates, n (%) 8 (32) 9 (36)
 SERM, n (%) 1 (4) 1 (4)
 Active vitamin D3 analog, n (%) 0 (0) 3 (12)
 Oral calcium, n (%) 2 (8) 0 (0)
Prevalent vertebral fractures, n (%) 14 (56) 14 (56) 1.000
T-score in lumbar spine −2.1 (−2.9, −1.1) −1.8 (−2.5, −1.1) 0.560
T-score in total hip −1.9 (−2.9, −1.1) −2.2 (−2.3, −1.8) 0.814
T-score in femoral neck −3 (−3.4, −2.5) −2.7 (−2.9, −2.3) 0.047
P1NP, ng/mL 41.4 (25.7, 57) 35.5 (21.1, 46.55) 0.275
TRACP-5b, mU/dL 458 (302, 528) 368 (263, 451) 0.195

Q1, 25th percentile; Q3, 75th percentile; bDMARD, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; MTX, methotrexate; RF, rheumatoid factor; CRP, C-reactive protein; DAS, disease activity score; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; Cr-eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated by creatinine; SERM, selective estrogen receptor modulator; P1NP, N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen; TRACP-5b, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b.