Table 2.
Type and model of MED-EL hearing devices (MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria) worn by the 88 HI recipients that were reported in Phase 2 of the survey
| Type | Model |
Ndevice (number of MRI scans per model of device) |
NT (number of MRI scans at different field strengths for each model of device) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 T | 1.5 T | 3.0 T | Other | Unknown | |||
| Cochlear implant | COMBI40/COMBI40 + | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| PULSAR | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| SONATA | 11 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| CONCERTO | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| SYNCHRONY | 48 | 0 | 35 | 9 | 1 | 3 | |
| Bone conduction device | BONEBRIDGE BCI 601 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Middle ear implant | SOUNDBRIDGE VORP 503 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Auditory brainstem implant (ABI) | SYNCHRONY | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other implant* | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Ndevice denotes the number of MRI scans that were performed on each model of the types of hearing devices reported in the survey. NT denotes the number of MRI scans that were performed on each model of the types of hearing devices. Answer options consisted of magnetic field strengths 0.2, 1.5, and 3.0 T, and “other” and “unknown”; “other” was an answer option for cases where the field strengths were known to survey respondents but were not one of the numerical field strength options; “unknown” denotes field strengths that were not known to survey respondents
*Hearing implant from another company