Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 13;278(11):4433–4439. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06659-y

Table 2.

Data analysis by the several reviewers

Diagnostic Metrics P S1 S2 S3 All
Value (95%CI) Value (95%CI) Value (95%CI) Value (95%CI) Value (95%CI)
Sensitivity 89.72% (82.35–94.76) 95.33% (89.43–98.47) 90.65% (83.48–95.43) 84.11% (75.79–90.46) 89.95% (86.71–92.63)
Specificity 80.65% (68.63–89.58) 51.61% (38.56–64.50) 95.16% (86.50–98.99) 87.10% (76.15–94.26) 78.63% (73.00–83.56)
PPV 88.89% (82.74–93.03) 77.27% (72.38–81.52) 97.00% (91.46–98.99) 91.84% (85.43–95.57) 87.90% (85.10–90.24)
NPV 81.97% (71.93–88.96) 86.49% (72.46–93.97) 85.51% (76.53–91.43) 76.06% (67.03–83.23) 81.93% (77.22–85.85)
Accuracy 86.39% (80.28–91.17) 79.29% (72.39–85.13) 92.31% (87.21–95.84) 85.21% (78.94–90.19) 85.80% (82.94–88.34)

S surgeon, P pathologist, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value; (95% Confidence Interval)