Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 1;11(10):163. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00555-8

Table 4.

Analysis of investigator-assessed response rates by subgroup.

Venetoclax +LDAC Placebo + LDAC
N CR, n (%) CR/CRi, n (%) CR/CRh, n (%) N CR, n (%) CR/CRi, n (%) CR/CRh, n (%)
Age
18 to <75 years 61 17 (27.9) 28 (45.9) 27 (44.3) 28 2 (7.1) 4 (14.3) 4 (14.3)
≥75 years 82 23 (28.0) 41 (50.0) 42 (51.2) 40 3 (7.5) 5 (12.5) 6 (15.0)
Cytogenetic riska
Intermediate 90 29 (32.2) 51 (56.7) 50 (55.6) 43 4 (9.3) 7 (16.3) 8 (18.6)
Poor 47 8 (17.0) 13 (27.7) 15 (31.9) 20 1 (5.0) 2 (10.0) 2 (10.0)
AML type
De novo 85 31 (36.5) 47 (55.3) 50 (58.8) 45 5 (11.1) 8 (17.8) 9 (20.0)
Secondary 58 9 (15.5) 22 (37.9) 19 (32.8) 23 0 1 (4.3) 1 (4.3)
Prior HMA treatment
Yes 28 2 (7.1) 8 (28.6) 6 (21.4) 14 0 1 (7.1) 1 (7.1)
No 115 38 (33.0) 61 (53.0) 63 (54.8) 54 5 (9.3) 8 (14.8) 9 (16.7)

aSeven total patients (n = 5 venetoclax arm, n = 2 placebo arm) had missing cytogenetic risk profiles. Four total patients were deemed to have favorable cytogenetic risk (n = 1 venetoclax, n = 3 placebo) and their response data were not presented due to small sample size.

AML, acute myeloid leukemia, CR complete response, CRh CR with partial hematologic recovery, CRi CR with incomplete hematologic recovery, HMA hypomethylating agent, LDAC low-dose cytarabine.