Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 2;3(3):96–102. doi: 10.2991/chi.k.210718.001

Table 2.

Treatments, syndromes, and outcomes of patients who received CAR T-cell therapy

Characteristic All patients (n = 40) (%) Complete case patients (n = 33) (%)
Type of CAR T received, n (%)
  axicabtagene-ciloleucel (Yescarta) 24 (60) 21 (64)
  brexucabtagene autoleucel (Tecartus) 8 (20) 6 (18)
  tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) 5 (13) 3 (9)
  Experimental anti B-cell maturation antigen (anti-BCMA) therapies 3 (7.5) 3 (9)
Pre-treatment left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
  Normal LVEF ≥ 50%, n (%) 36 (90) 30 (91)
  Moderately reduced LVEF 30–45%, n (%) 3 (7.5) 2 (6)
  No pre-treatment echocardiogram 1 (2.5) 1 (3)
Post-treatment LVEF
  Normal LVEF ≥ 50%, n (%) 10 (25) 9 (27)
  Moderately reduced LVEF 30–45%, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0)
  No post-treatment echocardiogram 30 (75) 24 (73)
Maximum grade of cytokine release syndrome (CRS)*, n (%)
  Grade 2 17 (43) 15 (45)
  Grade 1 14 (35) 11 (33)
  No CRS 9 (23) 7 (21)
Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome 19 (48) 16 (48)
All-cause mortality at 1 year 7 (18) 5 (15)
All-cause mortality at median 588 days of follow-up** 11 (28) 8 (24)
*

CRS treatment statistics: Among the 17 patients who had CRS of maximum grade 2, 10/17 received corticosteroids, 10/17 received intravenous fluids, and 13/17 received tocilizumab. Among 13 patients who had CRS of maximum grade 1 or no CRS, 5/23 received corticosteroids, 2/23 received intravenous fluids, and 8/23 received tocilizumab.

**

Cause of death was progression of cancer in 6/11; or indiscernible from chart review due to use of outside hospitals or hospice agencies in 5/11.