Table 5.
Errors of the values and positions of the IC peak (in %): Case 3
| Peak no. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G01 | ||||
| Value | −1.184 | 0.213 | −0.243 | 0.729 |
| Position | 0.002 | −0.008 | −0.004 | 0.008 |
| G02 | ||||
| Value | −1.448 | 0.372 | 0.586 | −0.002 |
| Position | −0.02 | −0.042 | −0.039 | −0.164 |
| G03 | ||||
| Value | −0.877 | 1.169 | 0.238 | −0.100 |
| Position | −0.019 | 0.006 | −0.059 | −0.077 |
| G04 | ||||
| Value | −0.589 | 1.241 | 0.394 | NAa |
| Position | −0.014 | −0.013 | −0.079 | NAa |
| G05 | ||||
| Value | −0.768 | 1.186 | 0.689 | NAa |
| Position | −0.014 | −0.008 | −0.077 | NAa |
| G06 | ||||
| Value | −2.024 | 0.584 | 0.346 | 1.062 |
| Position | −0.012 | 0.084 | −0.151 | −0.220 |
The IC peak has not been fully observed when the cut-off condition of the pack is reached.