Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 29;2016(8):CD011826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011826.pub2

for the main comparison.

Bronchodilators delivered by nebuliser versus pMDI with spacer for exacerbations of COPD
Patient or population: participants with an exacerbation of COPD; people with asthma excluded from our analysis
Settings: treatment was allowed at home or in the clinic or hospital.
Intervention: nebuliser
Comparison: pMDI with spacer
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
pMDI with spacer Nebuliser
Change in FEV1 1 h after dosing in ml The mean change in FEV1 1 h after dosing in the pMDI group was 103 ml The mean change in FEV1 1 h after dosing in the nebuliser group was 36 ml more (from 38 ml fewer to 110 ml more) 40
 (1) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 Very lowa
Serious adverse events 88 per 1000 88 per 1000 (17 to 348) OR 1.00 ( 0.18 to 5.53) 70
 (2) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Lowb
Change in FEV1 closest to 1 h after dosing in ml The mean change in FEV1 closest to 1 h after dosing in the pMDI group is93 ml The mean change in FEV1 closest to 1 h after dosing in the nebuliser groups was 83 ml more (10 to 156 ml more) 126
 (4) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Lowb
Change in dyspnoea score during the first 24 h after dosing The mean change in dyspnoea score during the first 24 h after dosing−1.28 points on the Borg scale (lower score indicates reduced dyspnoea) The mean change in dyspnoea score during the first 24 h after dosing was 0.12 points worse (0.56 better to 0.79 worse) on the Borg scale in the nebuliser groups 74
 (2) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Lowb A lower Borg score indicates reduced dyspnoea
Adverse events/side effects 56 per 1000 89 per 1000 (24 to 278) OR 1.65 (
0.42 to 6.48)
110
 (3) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Lowb
The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; ml: millilitres; FEV1 : forced expiratory volume in 1 second; pMDI: pressurised metered dose inhaler.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

aDowngraded for sample size (only one small study included in the analysis) (−2) and indirectness (e.g. older trials, so devices used may not be relevant to clinical practice today, and heterogeneity in dose between the groups) (−1)
 bDowngraded for sample size of the included trials (−1) and indirectness (e.g.older trials, so devices used may not be relevant to clinical practice today and heterogeneity in dose between the groups) (−1)