Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 2;16:195. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01921-3

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analyses for prognostic factors of AC benefit through the transformation model

Prognostic factors Univariate analyses Multivariate analyses
OS PFS OS PFS
P HR (95.0% CI) P HR (95.0% CI) P HR (95.0% CI) P HR(95.0% CI)

Gender

Male/female

0.059 2.786 (0.962–8.068) 0.069 3.374 (0.908–12.538) 0.251 2.071 (0.598–7.174) 0.204 2.513 (0.606–10.421)

Age

< 60/ ≥ 60

0.820 0.909 (0.401–2.063) 0.873 0.932 (0.392–2.213)

ECOG Scoring

0/1–2

0.249 0.624 (0.280–1.391) 0.743 1.151 (0.497–2.666)

Tumor location

Up/down

0.115 0.520 (0.231–1.173) 0.212 0.585 (0.253–1.356)

Clinical stage

II–III/IV

0.001 0.208 (0.082–0.531) 0.102 0.485 (0.204–1.156) 1.000

T stage

T2-3/T4

0.139 0.423 (0.135–1.324) 0.050 0.335 (0.112–1.001) 0.064 0.304 (0.086–1.070)

N stage

N0-1/N2-3

0.002 0.240 (0.097–0.596) 0.141 0.523 (0.221–1.240) 1.000

Radiation dose

< 59.4 Gy/ ≥ 59.4 Gy

0.444 1.438 (0.568–3.641) 0.177 1.913 (0.746–4.903)

MacroType

Fungating + Ulcer/Medulla + Constrictive

0.129 0.538 (0.242–1.197) 0.004 0.280 (0.116–0.673) 0.005 0.246 (0.092–0.661)

CT Regimen

PF/TP

0.893 0.947 (0.428–2.093) 0.962 1.020 (0.443–2.352)

Target Delineation

ENI/IFI

0.922 1.040 (0.473–2.288) 0.726 1.160 (0.506–2.662)

Short-term response

Good/poor

< 0.001 5.500 (2.305–13.126) < 0.001 5.029 (2.039–12.399) < 0.001 5.969 (2.258–15.776) 0.003 4.395 (1.650–11.710)