Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 2;19:413. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-03082-z

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of second 3 point decrease of QMGS

Parameters Univariate Multivariate
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Sex
 Male Ref. –
 Female 1.11 (0.87 to 1.41) 0.398
Age, years
 < 42 Ref. – Ref. –
 ≥ 42 0.52 (0.40 to 0.66)  < 0.001 0.53 (0.41 to 0.68)  < 0.001
Disease course, months
 < 8 Ref. –
 ≥ 8 0.85 (0.67 to 1.07) 0.164
Preoperative steroids
 No ref –
 Yes 0.94 (0.74 to 1.20) 0.622
MGFA class
 I + IIA Ref. – Ref. –
 IIB–V 0.74 (0.57 to 0.96) 0.025 0.79 (0.61 to 1.03) 0.087
Surgical approach
 Sternotomy Ref. –
 VATS 1.12 (0.75 to 1.67) 0.577
Masaoka-Koga stage
 I Ref. – Ref. –
 IIa–IIIa 0.51 (0.32 to 0.80) 0.004 0.53 (0.33 to 0.84) 0.007
WHO pathologic type
 A + AB Ref. –
 B1–B3 1.23 (0.87 to 1.74) 0.237
Tumor size
 ≤ 5 cm Ref. – Ref. –
 > 5 cm 0.67 (0.45 to 0.98) 0.042 0.92 (0.61 to 1.39) 0.705
Complete resection
 No Ref. – Ref. –
 Yes 22.08 (2.03 to 240.48) 0.011 Failed estimationa –

aFailed estimation was due to insufficient number of cases

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; MGFA, Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America; QMGS, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score; VATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery;WHO, World Health Organization