Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 2;19:413. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-03082-z

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of second 3 point decrease of QMGS

Parameters Univariate Multivariate
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Sex
 Male Ref.
 Female 1.11 (0.87 to 1.41) 0.398
Age, years
 < 42 Ref. Ref.
 ≥ 42 0.52 (0.40 to 0.66)  < 0.001 0.53 (0.41 to 0.68)  < 0.001
Disease course, months
 < 8 Ref.
 ≥ 8 0.85 (0.67 to 1.07) 0.164
Preoperative steroids
 No ref
 Yes 0.94 (0.74 to 1.20) 0.622
MGFA class
 I + IIA Ref. Ref.
 IIB–V 0.74 (0.57 to 0.96) 0.025 0.79 (0.61 to 1.03) 0.087
Surgical approach
 Sternotomy Ref.
 VATS 1.12 (0.75 to 1.67) 0.577
Masaoka-Koga stage
 I Ref. Ref.
 IIa–IIIa 0.51 (0.32 to 0.80) 0.004 0.53 (0.33 to 0.84) 0.007
WHO pathologic type
 A + AB Ref.
 B1–B3 1.23 (0.87 to 1.74) 0.237
Tumor size
 ≤ 5 cm Ref. Ref.
 > 5 cm 0.67 (0.45 to 0.98) 0.042 0.92 (0.61 to 1.39) 0.705
Complete resection
 No Ref. Ref.
 Yes 22.08 (2.03 to 240.48) 0.011 Failed estimationa

aFailed estimation was due to insufficient number of cases

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; MGFA, Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America; QMGS, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score; VATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery;WHO, World Health Organization