Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun;24(6):767–775. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2021.53316.12011

Table 2.

Comparison of grip strength of the affected forelimb among the different groups (g) of experimental rats

time(d) Sham tMCAO60min tMCAO90min tMCAO120min
3 636.55±51.32 494.31±83.93* 431.13±116.61* 331.24±90.56*#$
7 678.83±74.32 601.65±62.67 502.80±141.07* 366.69±116.88*#$
14 794.31±53.19 705.94±126.06 653.45±126.24* 467.88±191.50*#$
21 842.35±55.02 777.75±70.24 712.40±83.65* 593.07±167.00*#$
28 873.80±83.95 833.68±93.76 819.17±74.53 684.20±114.15*#$

*P<0.05 vs sham, #P<0.05 vs tMCAO60min, $P<0.05 vs tMCAO90min