Table 2:
Reference | Study Type | Study Goal | Human Population Studied (N) | Major Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
GI Cancers | ||||
Colorectal Cancer | ||||
Dejea CM et al (39) | Mouse model & human samples | To study the role of biofilm formation in the progression of hereditary colon cancer. | 5 FAP patients, 1 juvenile polyposis syndrome patient | Biofilms containing co-colonization with ETBF and pks+ E. coli promotes carcinogenesis through mucus degradation enabling pks+ E. coli adherence and subsequent DNA damage as well as IL-17 induction by both bacteria. |
Kitamoto S et al (35) | Mouse model | To investigate how periodontal inflammation exacerbates gut inflammation | N/A | Oral pathobionts and oral pathobiont-reactive Th17 translocate to the gut and cause development of colitis. |
Pleguezlos-Manzano C et al (14) | Organoid & human samples | To identity mutagenic characteristics of pks+ E. coli | 5786 cancer genomes | Revealed a distinct mutational signal in organoids injected with pks+ E. coli that was detected in a subset of predominantly CRC human cancer genomes. |
Wilson MR et al (22) | Cell lines & mouse model | To determine the molecular mechanism of the genotoxic effects of colibactin | N/A | Colibactin alkylates DNA in vitro and the metabolite was identified in mice colonized with pks+ E. coli. |
Pancreas | ||||
Geller LT et al (55) | Mouse model & human samples | To study impact of microbes on PDAC chemotherapy | 113 human PDAC samples | Mouse model: Bacteria, likely Gammaproteobacteria, metabolize the chemotherapeutic drug gemcitabine via long isoform of cytidine deaminase conferring gemcitabine resistance; Human samples: PDACs contain Gammaproteobacteria populations. |
Pushalkar S et al (56) | Mouse model & human samples | To define PDAC microbiome-mediated immune mechanisms of oncogenesis | Fecal samples (N=32 patients with PDAC; N=31 healthy volunteers); Pancreas tissue samples (N=5 healthy or PDAC patients each) | Mouse model: The PDAC microbiome promotes disease progression through innate immune & T-cell intratumoral immunosuppressive mechanisms that can enable response to checkpoint-based immunotherapy. Human samples: Proteobacteria are prominent in PDAC tissues. Comparison of patients with both gut & PDAC microbiome analysis suggest increase translocation of Proteobacteria to the pancreas. |
Riquelme E et al (57) | Mouse model & human samples | To identify microbiome mechanisms contributing to long-term survival in PDAC patients. | PDAC tissues from short-term survivors (STS) (N=22 primary cohort, 10 validation cohort) & long-term survivors (LTS) (N=21 primary cohort, 15 validation cohort); stools from PDAC STS, LTS-no disease & healthy controls (N=8–17/group) | Mouse model: Human-to-mouse FMT from STS, LTS or controls differentially modulated the tumor microbiome, TME and tumor progression, mirroring patient outcomes. Human samples: STS and LTS PDAC patients display distinct tumor microbiomes with LTS PDAC enriched in Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacillus clausii. |
Gastric | ||||
Choi IJ et al (47) | Human samples | To determine whether antibiotic clearance of H. pylori can prevent development of metachronous gastric cancer | Prospective clinical trial of 470 patients who had prior endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer or high-grade adenoma and received either antibiotics (to clear H. pylori) or placebo | H. pylori antibiotic clearance reduced the incidence of metachronous gastric cancer by nearly 50% (13.4% vs. 7.2% treatment vs. placebo) and improved gastric corpus atrophy. |
Non-GI Cancers | ||||
Lung | ||||
Greathouse KL et al (66) | Human samples | To define the microbiome associations of lung cancer vs patient-matched normal lung tissues. | Retrospective analysis of prospective National Cancer Institute-Maryland study; N=106 matched pairs of lung tumor and non-tumor tissues. Includes a TCGA-derived validation cohort. | Identified microbiome-gene and microbiome-exposure interactions in squamous cell carcinoma lung cancer tissues. Specifically, enrichment of Acidovorax spp. in smoking-associated squamous cell carcinoma lung cancers with TP53 mutations. |
Jin C et al (67) | Mouse model | To identify the contribution of the local lung microbiota to lung cancer development | N/A | Local lung microbiota promotes lung cancer development in KP mice. Local lung dysbiosis induces tumor-promoting inflammation attributable to ɣδ –T17 cells and myeloid cells. |
Tsay J-C J et al (68) | Mouse model & human samples | To define human microbial signatures associated with lung cancer prognosis & disease mechanisms. | N=83 prospectively enrolled lung cancer patients | Human samples: A lower airway microbiota signature enriched with oral commensals associated with worse lung cancer prognosis. Human samples & mouse model: Lung cancer dysbiosis was associated with upregulation of IL-17, PI3K-AKT, MAPK and ERK pathways as well as IL-6/IL-8. Veillonella parvula was the most abundant taxon driving the association. |
Breast | ||||
Parhi L et al (70) | Mouse model & human samples | To investigate the contribution of Fusobacterium nucleatum to breast cancer development. | N=50 FFPE breast cancer samples with N=30 matched adjacent non-tumor tissues | Human samples: Gal-GalNAc levels are increased in breast cancer samples. Using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, ~30% of breast cancer samples displayed increased F. nucleatum reads. Mouse model: IV inoculation of F. nucleatum into an orthotropic breast cancer model resulted in Fap2-mediated F. nucleatum tumor colonization and enhanced tumor growth inhibited by antibiotics. |
Parida S et al (71) | Mouse model & human samples | To investigate the breast microbiome | Utilized available human datasets comparing benign & malignant breast tumors as well as nipple aspirate fluids of breast cancer survivors & healthy volunteers | Human data: Meta-analysis of breast cancer microbiome studies identified Bacteroides fragilis in breast tumor tissues. Mouse model: Gut or breast intraductal colonization with a toxin-producing molecular subset of B. fragilis (ETBF) induced growth and metastasis of breast cancer cells potentially mediated by β–catenin and Notch1 signaling. |
Head & Neck | ||||
Hayes RB et al (64) | Human samples | To define whether changes in the oral microbiome precede HNSCC | Oral rinse samples from 383 patients from the CPS-II and PLCO studies, including 129 incident cases of HNSCC and 254 controls | The strongest microbial associations identified were protective effects of Kingella and Corynebacterium genera in larynx cancer and smokers, a biologically plausible mechanism due to the cigarette toxin-neutralizing capabilities of these taxa. |
Genitourinary | ||||
Shrestha E et al (83) | Human samples | To define whether the urinary microbiome is associated with prostate cancer | Urine samples from 135 men with or without prostate cancer | Total prostate cancer cases did not cluster differently from controls; however, a cluster of cases harbored a striking flora containing 6 pro-inflammatory bacteria suggesting possible subsets of prostate cancer that may be driven by the urinary microbiome. |
Abbreviations: CRC, colorectal cancer; ETBF, enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis; FAP, familial adenomatous polyposis; Fap2, Fusobacterium adherence protein 2; FFPE, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded; FMT, fecal microbiota transplantation; GI, gastrointestinal; KP, mice bearing Kras mutation and p53 loss; N/A, not applicable; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TME, tumor immune microenvironment.
Recent defined as 2016 or later