Table 2.
Study quality assessment using PROBAST.
| Study ID | Domain 1. | Domain 2. | Domain 3. | Domain 4. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants | Predictors | Outcome | Analysis | |
| Kim et al. (15) | + | + | ? | – |
| Nori et al. (16) | + | + | + | + |
| Fisher et al. (27) | + | + | ? | ? |
| Wang et al. (29) | + | + | + | ? |
| Mar et al. (30) | + | + | + | ? |
| Park et al. (31) | + | + | + | + |
| Jauk et al. (32) | + | + | ? | ? |
| Ben Miled et al. (7) | + | + | – | ? |
| Nori et al. (33) | + | ? | + | + |
| Mar et al. (34) | + | + | + | + |
| Tsang et al. (17) | + | + | + | ? |
+ indicates low ROB; – indicates high ROB; ? indicates unclear ROB.