Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 10;62:100104. doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2021.100104

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Classification of NAFL subgroups. A: Classification of NAFL subgroups against HO and NASH groups by ratios of SM 43:1;2 to SM 38:2;2 and SM41:3;2 to SM 38:2;2 whose trend lines are shown in Fig. 3C. B: Violin plots of log2-scaled abundances of CE 18:3, DG 34:1, and PE O- 38:7 in the three NAFL subgroups. Color coding of in panels A and B is the same as in Fig. 3C. C: Distribution of NAFL patients in bicluster components indicating the representative number of patients in each subgroup.