Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 1;11(10):e046314. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046314

Table 2.

Clinical tests to verify pelvic girdle pain

Variable Acupuncture TENS Excluded after baseline test, n=15
n=56 n=57
Reported pubic pain, n (%)
 No 20 (35.7) 20 (35.1) 5 (33.3)
 Yes 36 (64.3) 37 (64.9) 10 (67.7)
Reported sacroiliac pain, n (%)
 No 4 (7.1) 4 (7.0) 1 (6.7)
 Yes 52 (92.9) 53 (93.0) 14 (93.3)
Localisation sacroiliac pain, n (%)
 Unilateral 6 (11.5) 7 (13.0) 2 (15.4)
 Bilateral 46 (88.5) 47 (87.0) 11 (84.6
n=52 n=54 n=13
Positive MAT-test, n (%)
 No 29 (51.8) 29 (51.8) 8 (53.3)
 Yes 27 (48.2) 27 (48.2) 7 (46.7)
Positive 4P-test, n (%)
 No 6 (10.7) 2 (3.5) 1 (6.6)
 Yes, unilateral 9 (16.1) 16 (28.1) 4 (26.7)
 Yes, bilateral 41 (73.2) 39 (68.4) 10 (66.7)
Positive SIJ-separation, n (%)
 No 24 (42.9) 24 (42.1) 5 (33.3)
 Yes 32 (57.1) 33 (57.9) 10 (66.7)
Positive SIJ-compression, n (%)
 No 42 (75.0) 38 (66.7) 10 (66.7)
 Yes 14 (25.0) 19 (33.3) 5 (33.3)
Positive sacrum ventral-test, n (%)
 No 29 (51.8) 31 (54.4) 8 (53.3)
 Yes 27 (48.2) 26 (45.6) 7 (46.7)
Positive ASLR-test, n (%)
 No 10 (17.8) 8 (14) 4 (26.7)
 Yes, unilateral 15 (26.8) 19 (33.4) 3 (20.0)
 Yes, bilateral 31 (55.4) 30 (52.6) 8 (53.3)

ASLR, active straight leg raise; MAT, pulling a mat-test; 4P, posterior pain provocation-test; SIJ, sacroiliac joint; TENS, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.