Table 3.
Characteristics of mixed methods studies included in this review.
| Author, year, Location | Study aim | Sample size | Methods and data analysis | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mather et al., 2016 [30] Australia |
To investigate the use of mobile learning by undergraduate student nurses revealed barriers, challenges, risks, and benefits to using mobile learning at the workplace. | Undergraduate nurses (sample size not provided) | Online survey study and guided questions, method of quantity data analysis was not stated, thematic coding. |
|
| Burke et al., 2014 [34] USA |
To investigate students’ views on podcast materials. | 87 nursing students | Questionnaire study and open-ended questions, method of quantity data analysis was not stated, thematic coding. | Students believed podcasts enriched their learning, and reported podcasts as valuable tools in the learning environment. Most students would recommend podcasting in other courses. |
| Lai et al., 2016 [35] Taiwan, China |
To investigate the benefits of using the mobile e-portfolio-based system. | 10 s-year nursing students | Questionnaire study and open-ended questions, content analysis method |
|
| Wu et al., 2014 [31] Taiwan, China |
To investigate the benefits of using mobile devices and cloud learning. | 68 fourth-year nursing students | Questionnaire study and in-depth interviews, χ2 test. |
|
| O'Connor et al., 2018 [32] Ireland |
To investigate students’ views on the use of smartphones with an installed app. | 200 undergraduate nursing students | Questionnaire study and open-ended questions, descriptive statistics, thematic analysis. |
|
| Dearnley et al., 2008 [36] United Kingdom |
To investigate the feasibility. | 24 midwife students | Questionnaire study and group focus, descriptive statistics, QRS software for qualitative data analysis. |
|
| Gallegos et al., 2019 [33] USA |
To describe students’ perceptions of engagement and learning using a mobile device | 59 undergraduate baccalaureate nursing students | Online survey study and oral interviews, analyzed using conventional content analysis. |
|