Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 16;114(4):1447–1454. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab195

TABLE 4.

Sensitivity analysis of the FA + Sm + D model1 using highly correlated FAs

FA2 (HR from FA + Sm + D model) Highly correlated3 FA (correlation) Average HR ± SE with highly correlated FA4 Average concordance ± SE using highly correlated FA4
16:1n–7 (1.25) 16:0 (0.62) 1.12 ± 0.06 0.786 ± 0.01
22:0 (0.93) 24:0 (0.80) 0.91 ± 0.03 0.787 ± 0.01
24:1n–9 (0.73) 0.90 ± 0.03 0.789 ± 0.01
O3I (0.85) 22:4n–6 (–0.59) 1.09 ± 0.06 0.789 ± 0.01
22:5n–6 (–0.52) 1.12 ± 0.04 0.791 ± 0.01
1

The FA + Sm + D model consists of age, sex, 4 FA metrics [14:0, 16:1n–7, 22:0, and O3I (20:5n–3 + 22:6n–3)], current smoking status, and prevalent diabetes. The model (Figure 1) has a concordance ± SE = 0.790 ± 0.01 and n = 2240. A, age; D, diabetes; FA, fatty acid; O3I, omega-3 index; S, sex; Sm, smoking.

2

14:0 had no highly correlated FAs except 16:1n–7, which was already in the model.

3

Correlation of ≥0.5 from Supplemental Table 2 (except for 20:5n–3 and 22:6n–3 because these 2 FAs constitute the O3I).

4

Across the 10 validation models.