Table 5.
The association between dietary fructose intake and the odds of having MetS
| Dietary fructose intake | p-Value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||
| Urban | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.09 (0.98, 1.21) | 1.13 (1.02, 1.26) | 1.01 (0.91, 1.12) | 0.048 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.08 (0.97, 1.20) | 1.10 (0.99, 1.23) | 0.97 (0.86, 1.09) | 0.058 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.03 (0.92, 1.17) | 1.08 (0.96, 1.22) | 0.97 (0.85, 1.11) | 0.336 |
| Rural | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.01 (0.90, 1.14) | 1.07 (0.96, 1.20) | 0.95 (0.84, 1.06) | 0.199 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.03 (0.92, 1.16) | 1.13 (1.00, 1.27) | 1.03 (0.90, 1.17) | 0.213 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.03 (0.90, 1.18) | 1.14 (0.99, 1.31) | 1.03 (0.89, 1.19) | 0.246 |
Model 1: crude; Model 2: adjusted gender, age, education, marital status, smoking, alcohol, physical activity, income, energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, fiber, TC; Model 3: model 2 plus BMI