Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2021 Jul 8;20(8):4153–4164. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00483

Table 5: Assessing FDR control.

Each p-value comes from a single t-test measuring whether the mean of the estimated FDP over the 10 sub-runs is significantly larger than the selected 5% FDR threshold. Each column uses a different computationally concatenated UPS1 and yeast run, and each row refers to a different FDR estimation procedure. Boldface values are significant at a Bonferroni corrected threshold of 0.004 (0.05/12). The analysis suggests that all-sub fails to control FDR.

FDR control method p-value 1 p-value 2 p-value 3
subset-search 0.25695 0.02642 0.20952
all-sub 0.0012944 0.0008953 0.0024908
group-FDR 0.05458 0.04435 0.05003
subset-neighbor search 0.59906 0.04705 0.56590