Table 3.
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Employee age | ….. | |||||||||||
2 | Employee gender | -.03 | ….. | ||||||||||
3 | Marital status | .08 | .10 | ….. | |||||||||
4 | Employee education | .05 | .04 | -.01 | ….. | ||||||||
5 | Employees' organizational tenure | .05 | .07 | .05 | -.03 | ….. | |||||||
6 | Family size | .03 | .03 | .04 | -.02 | .01 | …. . | ||||||
7 | Event-exposure stress | .14* | .11* | .08 | -.09 | .10 | -.04 | (.81) | |||||
8 | Family support | .04 | .05 | .09 | .10 | .02 | .05 | -.24* | (.87) | ||||
9 | PTG | -.16* | .10 | .07 | .09 | -.05 | .07 | -.18* | .35*** | (.78) | |||
10 | Positive stress mindset | -.12* | .09 | .05 | .10 | -.04 | .04 | -.15* | .41*** | .46*** | (.84) | ||
11 | Intrusive rumination | .09 | .07 | .02 | -.06 | .07 | -.01 | .22* | -.22* | -.09 | -.17* | (.80) | |
12 | Deliberate rumination | -.11 | .06 | .06 | .08 | -.02 | .04 | -.19* | .29** | .34** | .25** | -.16* | (.85) |
Mean | 33.42 | .32 | 6.38 | 4.6 | 3.48 | 3.56 | 4.13 | 3.71 | 2.59 | 3.62 | |||
SD | 7.08 | .39 | 3.71 | 2.2 | .56 | .42 | .48 | .52 | .34 | .39 | |||
Cronbach's α | .78 | .85 | .82 | .86 | .78 | .84 | |||||||
CCR | .77 | .84 | .81 | .86 | .79 | .83 | |||||||
AVE | .65 | .75 | .60 | .70 | .64 | .72 |
CCR = Composite construct reliability, AVE = Average variance extracted.
Values in parentheses exhibit the square root of the average variance extracted.
Standardized correlations reported * p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.
Spearman's rank-order correlation, the non-parametric version of the Pearson product-moment correlation, was utilized for the analysis. Data collected through Likert items anchored on several points can be deemed to be ordinal data (Cheng & Tsai, 2019; Knapp, 1990).